Jump to content


Cannabis is Food * Food is Medicine

cannabis is food food is medicine cannabis healing food marijuana is food cannabis is medicine/food

  • Please log in to reply
1 reply to this topic

#1 SkunkyAroma


    Skunk Head

  • Moderators
  • 1789 posts

Posted 16 April 2017 - 11:10 PM

Cannabis is food; food is medicine


According to Pedersen, in most cases when we talk about cannabis, people see through the eyes of pharmaceuticals or prescription drugs and this puts major limits on the cannabis discussion.

“When we deal with treating illness with prescription drugs we're dealing with poison, plain and simple,” he said. “When we deal with cannabis, cannabis is non-toxic and cannabis is actually a superfood even more nutritious than flax. So when we deal with cannabis, we're actually treating illness with food — nutrition, essentially. We're providing nutrition to our primary endocrine system — to our endocannabinoid system. So when we talk about what illnesses are we treating, basically what illness is in your body? What is it that your immune system is called into check?

“People have asked me, ‘Does cannabis treat Parkinson's disease?' I say ‘Yes.' They say, ‘Does it treat multiple sclerosis?' Yes. ‘Does it treat brain cancer? Stomach cancer? Prostate cancer?' ‘Yes' They go through the whole gamut and it's like, what is it that affects your body? What are the things that your immune system must deal with? Well, these are all the things that cannabis can assist us with because by fortifying our endocannabinoid system, we are aiding it in dealing with all of these issues. We produce cancer throughout our whole body throughout our whole life. We deal with cancer cells, you know, even in our mother's womb.”

Pedersen added that our endocannabinoid system is a major part of our primary endocrine system and is a crucial part of modulating the chemicals that control and maintain the body's homeostasis. The phytocannabinoids actually mimic the body's own endocannabinoids.

“If we produce cancer cells throughout our life, why is it at some point in time that suddenly now cancer is allowed to take — to run rampant?”, he asked. “And, we believe that the cause [of most cancer] is man-made — caused by the chemicals we ingest within the food we eat, prescription drugs, and other toxins we are exposed to. So, something affects our endocannabinoid system — throws it out of whack, it doesn't work the way it should — and then when we take large doses of phytocannabinoids, it's kind of like giving a super-charge to that system to kick it into working again. “And then we start seeing tumors shrinking — we start to see people responding remarkably.

“Cannabis as medicine hasn't come anywhere close to seeing where it's going to be from a commercial standpoint. Cannabis has the potential to replace upwards of 90 percent of the known pharmacopia — in so many different ways, because we are talking about a non-toxic substance treating terminal illness — treating debilitating illness. I have seen incredible miracles. I have stopped pediatric seizures in three minutes in my living room, when there was no drug on the market short of general anesthetic that could accomplish that task. Now, you may say that's bragging, but, I don't care. It's not me, it's the cannabis.”

Inside Knowledge

Did You Know?

More on cannabis From The Cannabist: In 2016, we saw some important cannabis research published in top medical journals — research that flips the script on previously held beliefs and research that backs up what we’ve already seen anecdotally with medical cannabis. Here are some of the year’s most important scientific studies on cannabis:


Cannabis and cancer

In addition to his commitment to changing both laws and perceptions, Pedersen plans to continue to utilize cannabis to help the people who come to him.

“I truly want to deal with legitimate illnesses, particularly terminal illnesses, that has become my focus, particularly children,” he said. “When patients come to me they are most often at Stage IV [of cancer], and at Stage IV they are already on chemotherapy and/or radiation. So, I'm not only dealing with the issues of the cancer, I'm also dealing with the issues of the traditional therapies the patient has already been undergoing. Treating the side effects of the chemo and radiation quite often eclipses the cancer.

“Wouldn't it be great if we lived in a world where when we had these terrible, terrible illnesses come about, like cancer, we chose the least volatile treatment first? And, why not choose the least volatile treatment first? Why not treat the cancer with food first? Then, if you don't see any development — if you don't see anything positive within a short period, then move on to the toxic substances. Why? Why not? Well, I'll tell you why not. And, the reason is because of expense. It's how much money our medical community rakes in from cancer therapy. A lot. This is really, truly the reason why we are not talking about the least volatile treatment first. Really, that's what we're talking.”

Cannabis can not only be an effective, valid cancer treatment, but also a first-line preventative measure, according to Pedersen.

“Cannabis affects a weakened and/or damaged endocannabinoid system, essentially supercharging it,” Pedersen explained. “The endocannabinoid system is responsible for dealing  with cancerous tumors, as well as basic cell health. Cannabis has actually been found to stimulate the production of endocannabinoids. Because it works with this endogenous system, it is effective in treating all forms of cancer – albeit, with varying levels of success based on the condition of the patient's heath, current damage from the cancer and conventional treatments, age, etc. Of course, cannabis oil is an excellent preventative treatment.  I have a family ravaged by stomach cancer. After losing one, too late to save him, I am now successfully treating a twin brother…preventative for another brother and sister.

“I wish more newly diagnosed cancer patients would try non-toxic cannabis first before moving onto toxic, neuro-damaging chemotherapy. However, most of the patients whom I treat with cannabis oil are taking it in addition to conventional therapies.  The fact that cannabis is nontoxic, makes it the perfect adjunct.

“Cannabis is a valid treatment for cancer — through the entire range of stages of cancers. Even at Stage IV, we are seeing miracles. We see the most astounding things. But the biggest factor I see with the patients I treat is improved quality of life. To be able to spend your remaining years, whatever number of years they be, with some quality of life — you enjoy your family and be able to go out peacefully, this is a very important factor, too.

“But, the real value that we are going to see in cancer cannabis therapies is going to come about when we really start seeing cannabis as food, because once cannabis is truly legal, and we can work with the amount — basically we get the price down on the plant material so everyone can afford it, we can start changing these things. Imagine a world where cancer is no more than an inconvenience. We know that patients can consume cannabis over extended periods of time because of the fact it's non-toxic and the fact it's a superfood and highly nutritious. They can consume it indefinitely. You can't do that with prescription drugs. You can't do that with these other therapies. Your kidneys and liver give out. I think cannabis stands the potential of replacing all cancer therapies. All cancer therapies.”

Utilizing cannabis therapy

There is a myriad of ways to utilize cannabis therapy including oral ingestion, suppositories, topical application, smoking, and vaping, according to Pedersen. But not all methods are created equal.

“When we smoke or vaporize cannabis, we take into our bodies upwards of 15 percent of the cannabinoids found in the cannabis,” Pedersen said. “When we eat cannabis, we take it orally, sublingually, or however, by mouth — we take into the body upwards of 30 percent of the cannabinoids that actually have medicinal value. When we take it orally, we also experience a great deal of euphoria, particularly if you don't take it regularly. Now, with suppositories, we get upwards of three times what you would get orally. You get 70 percent plus of the medicinal benefit from the cannabinoids. But, the other benefit you get from this is you get a dramatically reduced amount of euphoria and this has to do with the way it passes through in our rectum. Basically, the majority of the medication is making its way into the system, avoiding our liver, and by doing so we avoid much of the euphoria. So, you can understand that with the patients I'm working with, which are mostly end-of-life, Stage IV type scenarios, I'm really pushing the suppositories.

“When you are talking about topical applications, we have seen some really remarkable things with that. Much depends on the strength of the salve. We have seen a lot of salves you get in dispensaries that really aren't potent enough to do anything effectively. If the salves are potent enough, we see some remarkable benefits. It's perhaps one of the easiest ways to show patients the benefit of cannabis, particularly with people over the age of 50 or 60 years old. If you just allow them to apply a little bit to a knuckle, in 15 to 20 minutes they'll be back for more to apply to their hands and their other joints. The benefits are quite remarkable, increased mobility and much less pain with the topicals.”

Cannabis is not marijuana“Understand, that there is no state in the country where cannabis is actually legal. Cannabis is not legal in Colorado. Cannabis is highly regulated here. It's still considered by law to be a harmful, dangerous drug.”Mark Pedersen

The term marijuana is actually a derogatory, slang term, according to Pedersen, and one he never uses. “It's a derogatory term given to cannabis back in the time when certain people — the powers that be — were seeking to make cannabis illegal for financial benefit,” he explained. “That is the reason why cannabis was made illegal in 1937 was because of that very reason. The term marijuana was adopted because they wanted to confuse people so people would not make the association with cannabis. In 1938, the American Medical Association petitioned the federal government to get a medicinal waiver for medicinal cannabis. Of course, Congress refused.

“It was all a smokescreen. Its original reason was because certain players had the opportunity to make many many millions of dollars by displacing an entire industry, and the industry we are talking about is the industrial hemp industry. DuPont had just come out with nylon a couple of years before and when we think about nylon, we think about clothing, but looking through 1930s eyes, when we are talking about nylon we would be thinking about synthetic rope. Well, in the 1930s they couldn't compete with hemp because hemp was a superior product all the way around.”

Hemp and cannabis are one and the same thing, according to Pedersen.

“Some years back, they began trying to change the vernacular so you'd hear the word hemp — understand that back in the 40s and before, it was all called hemp,” he said. “It was all hemp because it was all one plant. Now there are three different designations we find within cannabis. Basically, it's cannabis sativa, cannabis indica, and cannabis ruderalis. But, when we talk about cannabis as medicine, it quite often is a blending of all three. The reasons for that are because different strains grown for different purposes grow at different rates. Different stages have different levels of different cannabinoids and once they realized this, they began cultivating it to basically concentrate those particular products or benefits within the plant.

“From an industrial hemp level, we are talking about a product that can be used to produce a wide range of different things, everything from plastics to food to building supplies, it just goes on and on and on. But, it is not a separate thing as they have tried to make it out to [be]. It's insane. It's all one thing. It's all cannabis.”

The legislative battle

Much of the battle to change legislation boils down to education, according to Pedersen.

“This is part of what I'm seeking to change legislatively in the work I'm doing in drafting state policy, but it all comes back to education and understanding about what we're talking about when we're talking about cannabis,” he said. “Ignorance is people who don't understand what they're dealing with — what they're talking about when they are drafting state policy, and then you end up with all this twisted logic.

“Understand, that there is no state in the country where cannabis is actually legal. Cannabis is not legal in Colorado. Cannabis is highly regulated here. It's still considered by law to be a harmful, dangerous drug. That is very important. The federal government has, since 1971, a controlled substance list which basically rates them from Schedule 1 to Schedule 5. Every state in the union has their own list, and some states look to the federal government for that list. The state of Colorado is one of those states. It's actually in it's revised statutes where it says that when it comes to controlled substances we look to the federal government. That's really important because we have a state like Colorado where people think cannabis is legal.”

However, that is definitely not the case, according to Pedersen. In Colorado, cannabis is rated as a Schedule 1 drug. As a comparison, heroin is also considered a Schedule 1 drug.

“So, now we see this huge disparity in the law,” he said. “[In Colorado] we have a controlled substance Schedule 1 drug that is being sold by 21-year-olds in retail stores. Think about what it would be like if a store opened up down the street from you and started selling heroin. You would see the bars on the windows and bars on the doors. You would see the big armed guard that stands out front. Just like we're seeing with cannabis in Colorado. The only difference is, cannabis is non-toxic. If you were to consume a cannabis regimen of 60 grams in one sitting, you would have a very uncomfortable experience followed by a very long sleep. Then you would probably have a couple of days you would be walking around in a cloud, then you would feel like a million bucks. You would not die from it because cannabis cannot kill you. Cannabis is food. It's food.”

This stark contradiction in law and drug scheduling is one thing Pedersen has been addressing in his legislative initiatives for the past seven years. “Why we treat it this way is because these states continue to maintain that cannabis is a schedule 1 drug,” he explained. “If you read the initiatives that I've written, in every one of them the very first mission is the removal of cannabis entirely from the controlled substances because food doesn't belong on a controlled substances list.”

Drug scheduling is not the only hurdle facing Pedersen in his legislative journey, another major problem is what he calls “baby steps.”

“The problem we have encountered all along is that baby steps do not work,” he said. “When it comes to issues like cannabis, the problem is that with each step that you make you create ancillary industries that exist only because of prohibition. Now, let me explain. Where Colorado is can be considered a baby step. They are on their way toward full legalization, some would say. But, the problem is that maintaining cannabis as a Schedule 1 drug is imperative so they can maintain the same level of controls. There is special packaging that has been developed and endorsed by the state. It's always money. It's always money. So, we have companies that their only purpose is designing special packaging. That's why I call my bills — my initiatives that I've written, the latest one for 2018 — a reset button because if my initiative was to go into place, all of this would go away. We would go back to square one; cannabis would be treated as a food, as it was prior to 1937.”

Inside Knowledge

Did You Know?

ECS Therapy Center The startling evidence of the ECS and the plethora of resulting scientific evidence that has followed has failed to morph the public dialogue about cannabis use from harmful, illegal substance to low-risk, non-toxic, potential health therapy or simple nutritional supplement for most, if not, all human beings. Nor, has public or professional education been a focus of policymakers. In short, the prohibition of cannabis has failed to become an issue of public health. Our mission is to develop a public health model for cannabis therapy.
Learn More

Battle of public perception

One of the major challenges facing Pedersen's efforts in getting cannabis legally reclassified is one of public perception. But, it is changing.

“In the events that I have held around the country, particularly in the Bible Belt, I'd say that 70 percent of those people are Sunday, go-to-church Christians,” he said. “I have taken and provided oil to a Kentucky Baptist preacher for his son. I have counseled with a Baptist preacher in a small town in Nebraska. I had a preacher in the middle of Oklahoma who his congregation was pooling cash to send one of their congregants who had cancer out to Colorado to get medication. I just met with a pastor here in Colorado who is hugely supportive of the work that I do.

“So, what we have here is we have a disparity in people's concepts. We have people who are within the cannabis community who truly don't think the rest of the world really would understand. But the fact is, the only reason people don't understand is because they just haven't received the education. How do we counteract that? We counteract it with education. We do it the same way in which cannabis was made illegal. It began becoming illegal in 1927, I believe it was, with California, and then by 1937, there were 20-some odd states that had pushed for these laws. And again, it all came about because of the fact that the people had no control in their own government. The lawmakers were determining these laws and passing them in the states' statutes. That's how cannabis became illegal.

“So, how do we change it back? We do it by working, particularly within those states that can do a direct initiative, where the people can truly decide their future and what the future of cannabis is, not crooked lawmakers.”

Changing cannabis' reputation as a drug that provides a “high” is another battle of misinformation and public misconception, according to Pedersen.

“People falsely compare it to the response we receive when we are talking about alcohol, but they are two completely different things,” he said. “When we consume alcohol it's held in our liver, as it's converted into a non-toxic substance — a substance that won't poison us. You know, even a spoonful of alcohol into our bloodstream will kill us. It has to be converted into a substance that our body can tolerate, and so when we consume vast amounts of alcohol what do we see? We see our liver swelling as it seeks to try to hold that alcohol — that poison — in there and not release it into the rest of our system. But, at some point, it cascades into our bloodstream and then it makes its way into our brain. What happens there? It begins killing our brain cells. That's poisoning.

“Well now, let's talk about cannabis in our systems. When we consume cannabis, it passes through our liver. Our liver sees it as food because that's rightly what it truly is. It's not only food, it's a substance that is familiar to our bodies. It's familiar because we produce these chemicals, endocannabinoids. OK, so what does our liver do? Cannabis passes right through the liver, and we consume what we need right then and then it stores the rest in our fat cells. This is why when in later times we exert ourselves and we need to call upon our endocannabinoids to repair our cells our body releases those phytocannabinoids stored up in our fat cells into our bloodstream. This is also why we can still test positive for cannabis sometimes weeks after we've consumed it — it's been stored away in our fat cells because our bodies naturally realize that cannabis is food.”

According to Pedersen,  the book “The eCS Therapy Companion Guide: A Reference Source for Your Endocannabinoid System”, written by Dr. Regina Nelson with contributions by Pedersen, is a great place to start if you want to learn the truth about cannibis. “It's available on Amazon,” he said. “Basically, what we sought to do with this book is to show the world the truth – to identify a lot of the falsehoods about cannabis, and to help people to understand that cannabis truly is food.”

But what about our children if cannabis becomes legal, or a “food”?

“We have a responsibility as parents to teach our children how we believe they should grow up,” Pedersen said. “And when we talk about cannabis, I can tell you that cannabis is non-toxic — that the euphoria we experience with cannabis does not harm us in any way, and that actually the longer we consume cannabis the less euphoria we experience — so, basically, it's negligible — it doesn't exist. Particularly among our children. Our children actually respond less quickly than we do as adults.

“So, the question comes down to, if you have an issue with your child experiencing euphoria, whether it's because of cannabis or any other substance, this is your personal duty as a parent to bring it up, to discuss it and also take and make sure your child adheres to those tenets that you personally subscribe to as a family. This is not something that is the duty of law enforcement or our court system because we are talking about food.

“Our schools and our law enforcement are not the ones who are supposed to teach the values to our children. We are supposed to teach values to our children,” Pedersen said. “We are supposed to instruct our children what is right and what is wrong. Laws are not in place to make children obey them. No. We instill those values in our children, as parents.

“You know, I raised three children. Not one of my children drank bleach or ammonia — none of those things. We never had a lock on the cupboard where those things were contained. Our kids knew where the Tylenol was in the medicine cabinet. They didn't go take it without talking to us first. They never even thought about doing that.”


The myriad of health and disease-fighting benefits of cannabis are almost impossible to comprehensively list, but it is clear it is an amazing weapon in the war against cancer. Cannabis, which is non-toxic, is proven to be an immune stimulant, an effective pain reliever, anti-nausea,  cancer-fighting, and appetite-stimulating nervous system tonic and superfood.

The battle to reclassify cannabis as a food and not as a scheduled drug is an ongoing and crucial one. Pedersen and others who share his views are fighting to bring cannabis to a place in our society where it is an available, affordable superfood that can help people successfully fight and prevent all manner of serious illnesses, including cancer.

#2 SkunkyAroma


    Skunk Head

  • Moderators
  • 1789 posts

Posted 16 April 2017 - 11:21 PM

Cannabis plant contains plethora of medicinal molecules



April 6, 2017



The cannabis plant as a medicinal source is not new to the educated. However, the politics associated with this plant family is riddled with controversy.

As a hardier fiber, hemp should have been the preferred textile — however, it faced an uphill battle for acceptance against cotton. The cotton lobby sought and succeeded in ensnaring the hemp industry as shady nefarious bunch pushing an agenda to make Americans dope addicts.

(As a side note, during World War II hemp was legally grown in the United States and its fiber was used in extensively in troop garments i.e. parachutes.) [1]



Dr. Carlos M. Garcia — whose stated mission is to replace sick care with health care — is the Director of Medicine at Utopia Wellness, a leading-edge medical center that offers integrative, holistic, patient-focused medical treatments.

However, truth be told, the cannabis plant contains a plethora of delightfully medicinal molecules, which work within the untapped — as of yet — human endocannabinoid system. The reason America is now forging forward with cannabinoids is rooted in that fact that Big Pharma has no new sources for drug molecules. Molecular structures are usually isolated from plants, which are used by natural practitioners in forests or remote regions.

The illusion that Big Pharma’s bioengineers are able to devise molecules out of thin air is just that — an illusion. Today, Big Pharma is recycling old drugs or applying them to different diagnosis in order to protect their patents from the dreaded generic pharmaceutical competitors. This threat of extinction has forced Big Pharma to reconsider the marijuana plant as its future for sustainability and profits.

Fear not, I have all the faith in the world that Big Pharma will, once again, screw up the natural compounds for patent protection, resulting in two undesired features: side effects currently not seen in the natural unaltered molecule from hemp or cannabis, and decrease specificity and efficacy when compared to the unaltered molecule. (Remember you cannot patent a natural product.) [2]

The term “endocannabinoid” — originally coined in the mid-1990s after the discovery of membrane receptors for the psychoactive principle in Cannabis, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol and their endogenous ligands (when one molecule binds another, i.e. a receptor potentially starting or completing a chain of events) — now indicates a whole signaling system that comprises cannabinoid receptors, endogenous ligands and enzymes for ligand biosynthesis and inactivation.

The endocannabinoid system is a system of the body that controls many basic functions. The endocannabinoid system is made up of natural molecules known as cannabinoids and the pathways that they interact with. Together, these parts work to regulate a number of activities including mood, memory, sleep and appetite. The endocannabinoid system has been extensively studied at Hebrew University in Israel. American institutions are neophytes by comparison. [3]

This system seems to be involved in an ever-increasing number of pathological conditions. With novel products already being aimed at the pharmaceutical market little more than a decade since the discovery of cannabinoid receptors, the endocannabinoid system seems to hold even more promise for the future development of therapeutic drugs. We explore the conditions under which the potential of targeting the endocannabinoid system might be realized in the years to come.

Tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) is the most psychoactive cannabinoid. It is best known for causing the “high” you get from smoking marijuana. However, it also seems to have a number of medical applications such as neuropathic or nerve related pain relief, benefits for those suffering from post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD).

For those suffering from PTSD, THC may reduce the number of flashbacks and nightmares. THC appears to improve appetite while decreasing nausea and vomiting especially in cancer patients who placed their faith on chemotherapy. Other applications for THC appear to be in the realm of ameliorating asthmatic attacks. It appears to decreased intraocular pressure. It also may help those diagnosed with sleep apnea or insomnia, although it only appears to treat the symptoms, not its ideology.

Cannabidiol (CBD) is the second most common cannabinoid within the marijuana plant. The CBD molecule appears to have psychoactive effects. It appears to improve mood and alleviate pain. CBD may actually counteract THC’s psychotropic effect. CBD has received a lot of attention lately because of its anti-psychotic effect. CBD receptors are found throughout the nervous system. A study suggests CBD may be of profound aid with those people suffering from epilepsy schizophrenia and a number of other ailments for which traditional medicine has a poor understanding and is often helpless in the treatment of those severely afflicted. [4]

Cannabinol (CNB) is created from THC when cannabis is exposed to air. In chemistry, this referred to as oxidation. CNB by itself can cause mild psychoactive effects. It appears that CNB and THC have synergistic versus an antagonistic relationship. That is, if you were to ingest CNB with THC, you should have a more profound effect than if you took either one individually Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (Δ9-THC) and Cannabinol (CNB) were studied in man.

The study involved placebo, CNB, THC, and the combination of CNB with THC. THC by itself appears to heighten anxiety, i.e. increases heart rate and blood pressure. CBN by itself appears to do the opposite. However, when combined, there appears to be a neutralization of the anxiety effect caused by THC alone. However, the sensations of feeling more drugged, dizzy and/or drowsy was more profound when compared just to THC alone. The cannabinoid interaction appears to be a fascinating branch of medicine or pharmacology, which is in its infancy in the United States.

Cannabigerol (CBG) is a non-psychoactive cannabinoid. It appears to be the building block for THC and CBD. Cannabigerol (CBG) along with cannabinol (CNB) have been shown to decrease intraocular pressure. This is a potential windfall for those people diagnosed with glaucoma or increased intraocular pressure, which if left untreated may result in blindness. CBG lacked the intraocular toxicity and neurotoxicity.

Whereas the current buzz is that CBD and cannabinoids are the end-all for the ills of mankind, note that there appear to be some derivatives of the cannabis plant, which appear to be toxic or even lethal, given the appropriate dose, for man.

One final note, a little-known fact is that CBD, the very same substances legally sold across state lines, may be converted to THC in our stomach. Cannabidiol (CBD), a non-psychoactive product was found to be converted into 9α-hydroxyhexahydrocannabinol (9α-OH-HHC) and 8-hydroxyiso-hexahydrocannabinol (8-OH-iso-HHC) together with ∆9 -tetrahydrocannabinol (∆9 -THC). Those people who smoke marijuana while consuming CBD oils may have blood levels higher than expected for THC.

The common notion that CBD is totally safe and can be used with reckless abandon is a foolhardy concept at best.

Article Information
  1. “Hemp for Victory.” En.wikipedia.org. https://en.wikipedia...emp_for_Victory
  2. Ken LaMance “What Cannot Be Patented.” | LegalMatch Law Library. Legalmatch.com http://www.legalmatc...e-patented.html
  3. “Endocannabinoids: Overview, History, Chemical Structure.” Emedicine.medscape.com http://emedicine.med...361971-overview

0 user(s) are reading this topic

0 members, 0 guests, 0 anonymous users